<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jQuery vs. prototype.js</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs</link>
	<description>Coding! don&#039;t ask, we&#039;re too good at it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 18:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: su</title>
		<link>http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs#comment-16288</link>
		<dc:creator>su</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcoder.com/?p=30#comment-16288</guid>
		<description>http://madrobby.github.com/scriptaculous/effect-morph/

This effect changes the CSS properties of an element.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://madrobby.github.com/scriptaculous/effect-morph/" rel="nofollow">http://madrobby.github.com/scriptaculous/effect-morph/</a></p>
<p>This effect changes the CSS properties of an element.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sector</title>
		<link>http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs#comment-15834</link>
		<dc:creator>sector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcoder.com/?p=30#comment-15834</guid>
		<description>After I discovered jQuery OOP, I switched from Prototype into jQuery. It is simply amazing. There are tons of free jQuery plugins (decent Prototype plugins are not free), Theme Roller, selector chaining, smooth animations and jQuery UI. It took me 2 months to rewrite my Prototype into jQuery and now I have 80% less javascript code, which is very clean and readable. Thanks to jQuery, very well written framework with a lot of functionality. Reading its tutorial for me was enough to get started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After I discovered jQuery OOP, I switched from Prototype into jQuery. It is simply amazing. There are tons of free jQuery plugins (decent Prototype plugins are not free), Theme Roller, selector chaining, smooth animations and jQuery UI. It took me 2 months to rewrite my Prototype into jQuery and now I have 80% less javascript code, which is very clean and readable. Thanks to jQuery, very well written framework with a lot of functionality. Reading its tutorial for me was enough to get started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs#comment-15833</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcoder.com/?p=30#comment-15833</guid>
		<description>by scriptaculous i mean prototype INCLUDING scriptaculous. just to clerify</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by scriptaculous i mean prototype INCLUDING scriptaculous. just to clerify</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs#comment-15832</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcoder.com/?p=30#comment-15832</guid>
		<description>hey sector. jquery can be extended just as well as scriptaculous using the jQuery,extend functionality all i find from scriptaculous is buggy animations such as double clicking an element while in the process of an animation screws up the original placement/size of the element as where jquery does not when i see scriptaculous i see more of a &quot;rushed&quot; library containing a lot of &quot;rushed&quot; functionality versus  a &quot;well thought out, well written&quot; library such as jquery and as mentioned scriptaculous has some issues with some browser versions. again where jquery does not(as to my current knowledge) just my 2 cents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey sector. jquery can be extended just as well as scriptaculous using the jQuery,extend functionality all i find from scriptaculous is buggy animations such as double clicking an element while in the process of an animation screws up the original placement/size of the element as where jquery does not when i see scriptaculous i see more of a &#8220;rushed&#8221; library containing a lot of &#8220;rushed&#8221; functionality versus  a &#8220;well thought out, well written&#8221; library such as jquery and as mentioned scriptaculous has some issues with some browser versions. again where jquery does not(as to my current knowledge) just my 2 cents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nahum</title>
		<link>http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs#comment-7483</link>
		<dc:creator>nahum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcoder.com/?p=30#comment-7483</guid>
		<description>man use scripty2 is next generation of scriptacolous and I think is more about you are in kind of comfort with jquery but prototype has amazing tools like a real HASH that can help really really in a big project with a lot of data, of course if you are building a web page with 5 information sections this don&#039;t help a lot but put in mind that prototype have a little different scope than jquery have. I dont think any is better just difference but try new prototype 1.7 and http://scripty2.com/ ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man use scripty2 is next generation of scriptacolous and I think is more about you are in kind of comfort with jquery but prototype has amazing tools like a real HASH that can help really really in a big project with a lot of data, of course if you are building a web page with 5 information sections this don&#8217;t help a lot but put in mind that prototype have a little different scope than jquery have. I dont think any is better just difference but try new prototype 1.7 and <a href="http://scripty2.com/" rel="nofollow">http://scripty2.com/</a> &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sector</title>
		<link>http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs#comment-6748</link>
		<dc:creator>sector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcoder.com/?p=30#comment-6748</guid>
		<description>jQuery selectors may be better, and slightly less code comparing to Prototype. But Prototype provides OOP, one can write base classes, then extend those, adding new and overwriting existing methods. You just &quot;tried&quot; using Prototype without understanding its power. For huge projects Prototype suits much better than other frameworks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jQuery selectors may be better, and slightly less code comparing to Prototype. But Prototype provides OOP, one can write base classes, then extend those, adding new and overwriting existing methods. You just &#8220;tried&#8221; using Prototype without understanding its power. For huge projects Prototype suits much better than other frameworks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

