<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jQuery vs. prototype.js</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs/</link>
	<description>ABCoder - Coding is Simple as A b c</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:49:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sector</title>
		<link>http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs/comment-page-1/#comment-6748</link>
		<dc:creator>sector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcoder.com/?p=30#comment-6748</guid>
		<description>jQuery selectors may be better, and slightly less code comparing to Prototype. But Prototype provides OOP, one can write base classes, then extend those, adding new and overwriting existing methods. You just &quot;tried&quot; using Prototype without understanding its power. For huge projects Prototype suits much better than other frameworks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jQuery selectors may be better, and slightly less code comparing to Prototype. But Prototype provides OOP, one can write base classes, then extend those, adding new and overwriting existing methods. You just &#8220;tried&#8221; using Prototype without understanding its power. For huge projects Prototype suits much better than other frameworks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
