<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jQuery vs. prototype.js</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs/</link>
	<description>ABCoder - Coding is Simple as A b c</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 02:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nahum</title>
		<link>http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs/comment-page-1/#comment-7483</link>
		<dc:creator>nahum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcoder.com/?p=30#comment-7483</guid>
		<description>man use scripty2 is next generation of scriptacolous and I think is more about you are in kind of comfort with jquery but prototype has amazing tools like a real HASH that can help really really in a big project with a lot of data, of course if you are building a web page with 5 information sections this don&#039;t help a lot but put in mind that prototype have a little different scope than jquery have. I dont think any is better just difference but try new prototype 1.7 and http://scripty2.com/ ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man use scripty2 is next generation of scriptacolous and I think is more about you are in kind of comfort with jquery but prototype has amazing tools like a real HASH that can help really really in a big project with a lot of data, of course if you are building a web page with 5 information sections this don&#8217;t help a lot but put in mind that prototype have a little different scope than jquery have. I dont think any is better just difference but try new prototype 1.7 and <a href="http://scripty2.com/" rel="nofollow">http://scripty2.com/</a> &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sector</title>
		<link>http://abcoder.com/javascript/jquery/jquery-vs-prototypejs/comment-page-1/#comment-6748</link>
		<dc:creator>sector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcoder.com/?p=30#comment-6748</guid>
		<description>jQuery selectors may be better, and slightly less code comparing to Prototype. But Prototype provides OOP, one can write base classes, then extend those, adding new and overwriting existing methods. You just &quot;tried&quot; using Prototype without understanding its power. For huge projects Prototype suits much better than other frameworks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jQuery selectors may be better, and slightly less code comparing to Prototype. But Prototype provides OOP, one can write base classes, then extend those, adding new and overwriting existing methods. You just &#8220;tried&#8221; using Prototype without understanding its power. For huge projects Prototype suits much better than other frameworks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

